<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d15677816\x26blogName\x3dGathering+of+Engineers\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLUE\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://pdxgaming.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://pdxgaming.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d-1257436599043759910', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Gathering of Engineers

Ludographic considerations from the Silicon Forest

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Tuesday Tidbits

Well, yet another light gaming week for me. Seems I've been doing more things about games than actually playing them. In "light" of that, this week will be a collection of thoughts related to gaming in a variety of forms spawned by the events of the last 10 days or so.

I hosted a SimplyFun party (run by Mike) at my house a couple weeks ago. We had about eight people there – good fun, and I think Chris had the event blogged before he got home. Picked up Drive and Zing (Die Sieben Siegal). Jodie and I played Drive (which is actually Michael Schacht's Crazy Chicken) a couple nights ago and it was "eh." Probably better with four. It seems to fill a similar niche to Coloretto, but isn't as good. At least it's playable with 2 where Coloretto is not. Looking forward to Zing as Chris and Mike both rank it as one of their top trick-taking card games.

I like the idea of SimplyFun. Being a gamer that likes the deeper games, however, I do find their catalog a tad fluffy. That is by design, of course, as they're emphasizing the social aspects of game playing. A concept I fully endorse. Anything that gets families and friends together and interacting instead of parking themselves in front of the TV set is a good thing. One thing that SimplyFun does that other game companies should note is the production style.

Here's the things SimplyFun does with their games that I wish other companies would do:

  • Sturdy Boxes. Of course, they're nothing like the near bullet-proof box C&C: Ancients comes in, but they're very well made.

  • Rules summaries on the front cover of the rules. VERY handy for a refresher after you've learned the game and just need to remember things like number of cards and turn sequence.

  • Journals. Okay, for cost reasons I can see why this one isn't done. I've always liked the idea I heard way back when about keeping a sheet of paper in every game that details when the game was played, by who, and who won. SimplyFun includes a little (game-specific) booklet in each game specifically for this purpose. A nice touch.



Our Friday gaming group at work just loves Tanz der Hornochsen. I think we're up to six plays in that group – that might be our all-time high. It fills a good niche as it's not very complex, plays in an hour or less, and handles a large number of people. I'm open to other suggestions for games in this category. Frank's Zoo is another favorite that fits. (Criteria: 1 hour play time, handles 7 players, low complexity a plus but not mandatory. Chris would probably prefer it didn't contain simultaneous action selection.)

Got my copy of GMT's Commands and Colors: Ancients. This is Richard Borg's third entry in the Battle Cry/Memoir '44 series. Given that I'm a fan of wargames based in the 18th century or earlier, I'm predisposed to like this title. I haven't had a chance to play yet, but I did get all the blocks stickered up. I was setting the game out on Sunday when Mike came by and we chatted about it a bit. I think it'll end up being my favorite in the series due to the theatre and complexity. Mike wasn't too thrilled with the blocks, and I admit the game lacks the visual appeal of the earlier games. As discussed on Alfred's blog, 1/72nd plastic figures might be the way to go here, though getting two elephants or chariots to fit in those hexes will be a challenge. Might have to get creative with removable support figures or something.

Another wargame that arrived recently that (undeservedly) got shuffled away with holiday chaos was Flying Colors, also from GMT. This is a Napoleonic naval game that is geared for fleet actions, not individual ships. Well, "Napoleonic" is compartmentalizing it a bit. It does handle conflicts back into the Seven Years War as well. This is probably going to grab a spot in my solo gaming space. In fact, I better do that soon, because as soon as Here I Stand arrives, I'll be plonking that puppy down in eager anticipation of a six-player session.

On the miniatures side, I finally finished painting my 6mm Russian Cavalry for Peter the Great's army. All I have to do now is the artillery and command stands, and it's complete. The immediate need is for me to paint some Swiss skirmishers and pack horses for the DBM tournament at Conquest NW in a couple weeks. After that, I'm full bore onto Charles XII's Swedish army to take on those Russians. (then it's the Poles then Saxons... a miniaturists' job is never done...)

6 Comments:

  • At 9:33 AM, Anonymous Dave Wilson said…

    Saboteur is a fine choice for "large number of players, under an hour, low complexity". And depending on exactly how you define "large number of players" (i.e., if maxing out at 6 is large enough), I'd suggest looking at Space Beans (Scandinavian edition available from Funagain). Space Beans does also have its detractors, though, so researching before buying is advised. But my lunchtime group likes it.

     
  • At 10:03 AM, Blogger Eric said…

    I'll give Space Beans another look - I've got a copy in my box'o'cardgames. Thanks for the reminder on that one - it sort of got buried as it is NOT good for two, and that's where much of my gaming happens.

    I've picked up Saboteur a few times in the local shop, but never bit. I'll have to reconsider given this need. Thanks for the recommendation.

     
  • At 11:02 AM, Blogger Dug said…

    I owned Space Beans, but I think I gave away my copy to a friends kids in an attempt to grow gamers.

    It seemed like a fun little game, but I'd play Zircus Flohcati first.

     
  • At 12:21 PM, Blogger Eric said…

    Oh, I'm not saying I'm expecting Space Beans to be an undiscovered gem. And I really don't expect it to come out in a Rip City Gamers session.

    The group at work has a very different idea of what they like. It's rather interesting to see the differences in the two groups. Space Beans just might work for them.

     
  • At 2:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Given what I know of your work group, I suspect Space Beans will work for them - it's definitely a game that needs to be played fast, though, as while there is some thought involved, it isn't deep.

    I find the game fun as a brief filler, but too much of it would be a bad thing, if that makes any sense!

    Tim

     
  • At 11:03 AM, Anonymous Rita H said…

    I think SimplyFun definitly fills a niche market for bridging gamers from standard American games to Euros. I'm worried about their business model though. I'm not sure they can sustain the pace of good game development as fast as "home party" businesses typically demand.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home